|
Fact of Need vs. Cause of Need
Early programs assumed that those without jobs were defective.
This went along with the rugged individualism and frontier
mentality of the early settlers. Receiving relief had the
stigma of failure attached to it, and humiliating inquiry
into the personal affairs of the person. Here the cause of
need was important in determining eligibility, although
generally it was assumed that the person had a defect.
With fact of need once it is established that the
person is experiencing the risk, which the program
intended to address, she/he is assumed to be in need,
and benefits are paid without personal inquiry.
|